<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Talk or Not to Talk&#8230;&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deepish-thought.com/2008/to-talk-or-not-to-talk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deepish-thought.com/2008/to-talk-or-not-to-talk</link>
	<description>Insightful commentary, astute observation &#038; other junk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:03:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arminius</title>
		<link>http://deepish-thought.com/2008/to-talk-or-not-to-talk/comment-page-1#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>arminius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepish-thought.com/?p=54#comment-475</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A meeting with the President can be a significant carrot.&lt;/i&gt;
Because everybody else cares about photoops as much as US politicians do.

&lt;i&gt;Dictators, who don’t have answer to voters or the press, have no such concern.&lt;/i&gt;
Hm, ok, scratch my previous comment.

&lt;i&gt;The playing field is thus not level, which can easily result in the good guys making concessions that they probably shouldn’t.&lt;/i&gt;
What the frack? The other guy is not under any pressure to show results, which means that I have to cave in? Why? The sheer aura of his evilness broke my will and made me do it?

&lt;i&gt;I would tell him in no uncertain terms that his country is on a dangerous path that could lead to conflict with the United States.&lt;/i&gt;
I can imagine his response: &quot;Golly, I didn&#039;t know. I&#039;m so terribly sorry. I will immediately dismantle my nuclear program* and cancel all support to the Iraqi insurgency**. Anything else I can do for you, Mr. President? How about a nice BJ?&quot;

*Non-existant.
** Also non-existant. Remind me again, why is Iran such a big threat?

&lt;i&gt;We should have no illusions that my words alone will change the policies of the Iranian government.&lt;/i&gt;
That&#039;s because you&#039;re a stupid twit with illusions of grandeur. Among other things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A meeting with the President can be a significant carrot.</i><br />
Because everybody else cares about photoops as much as US politicians do.</p>
<p><i>Dictators, who don’t have answer to voters or the press, have no such concern.</i><br />
Hm, ok, scratch my previous comment.</p>
<p><i>The playing field is thus not level, which can easily result in the good guys making concessions that they probably shouldn’t.</i><br />
What the frack? The other guy is not under any pressure to show results, which means that I have to cave in? Why? The sheer aura of his evilness broke my will and made me do it?</p>
<p><i>I would tell him in no uncertain terms that his country is on a dangerous path that could lead to conflict with the United States.</i><br />
I can imagine his response: &#8220;Golly, I didn&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m so terribly sorry. I will immediately dismantle my nuclear program* and cancel all support to the Iraqi insurgency**. Anything else I can do for you, Mr. President? How about a nice BJ?&#8221;</p>
<p>*Non-existant.<br />
** Also non-existant. Remind me again, why is Iran such a big threat?</p>
<p><i>We should have no illusions that my words alone will change the policies of the Iranian government.</i><br />
That&#8217;s because you&#8217;re a stupid twit with illusions of grandeur. Among other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
